« More articles in Uncategorized   |   Go Home

Photo by Justin Lafferty 16:41, 23 August 2006...Image via WikipediaI’m not going to get into the merits of the Rich Harden trade for the teams involved; enough people have done that already, and the blogosphere is predictably lining up behind the A’s.

But I do want to point out how differently Billy Beane and the A’s go about their business than just about any other team in pro sports.

As unfair as it is to throw every other front office into one big basket, it really isn’t that much of an overstatement. Almost all teams are driven by public perception, to one extent or another. This is especially true amongst owners, most of whom are in sports as a hobby, and often choose being liked by the media over making rational decisions.

And then there are the A’s, who are rational at all times, and will trade their ace starter in the middle of a pennant race if they feel his value has peaked.

That seems ballsy on the surface, and I guess it is since so few other teams would have done it. But Lew Wolff and Billy Beane get it on a deeper level: for the A’s to be a successful business, they must win on the field. Therefore, every move should be made with that goal in mind, public perception be damned.

Many people like to point out that Beane can get away with these things because he has an extraordinary amount of political capital, and Oakland’s fanbase isn’t nearly as intense as some others. But every team is a business, and should be run like one. Getting maximum value out of all of your assets is a key function of that.

Not to pick on the Pirates, given that it’s tough to gauge the trade market from the outside looking in, but they should have been shopping Freddy Sanchez this past winter. He was coming off of back-to-back All-Star seasons, one in which he won the National League batting title. His value had peaked, and yet they held on to him, possibly because he is extremely popular in the area.

Again, that is a completely circumstantial assertion, but it is the norm amongst Major League front offices. There is an attitude that “we can’t trade him, or people will be pissed.” And yet the great majority of fans just want their team to win, and will spend more money at the ballpark if they do, regardless of who is wearing the uniform.

Whether this trade actually will help the A’s win is a different discussion. But the rationale behind it is solid, and the A’s should be given credit for being bold where others would have sat on their hands.

Feedback? Write a comment, or e-mail the author at shawn(AT)squawkingbaseball.com

Zemanta Pixie


4 Existing Comments

Add New Comment

  1. on July 10th at 09:09 am
    Andrew said:

    You wrote: “…Beane can get away with these things because he has an extraordinary amount of political capital…”

    Hasn’t he earned this capital in part by rationally running his team like a business?

  2. on July 10th at 01:46 pm
    monkeyball said:

    I agree with virtually all of your points except one:

    … for the AÕs to be a successful business, they must win on the field. Therefore, every move should be made with that goal in mind, public perception be damned.

    I think one of the most radical things Beane and his fellow owners have done is to disarticulate the “success” of the franchise from the on-field performance — or, rather, to simply realize that under the current Selig regime, it already has been disarticulated for many teams. Every MLB franchise is a massive value-appreciation machine, with various opportunities for y-y revenue generation. Marginal increases (or decreases) in ticket sales are, for most franchises, utterly irrelevant to appreciation, and not especially consequential to revenue.

    Beane’s rational, market-driven approach to roster construction has nothing whatsoever to do with impacting the franchise’s bottom line.

  3. on July 10th at 03:21 pm
    squawkingbaseball said:

    Andrew,

    Let’s take DePo as an example. The Lo Duca trade was considered a bold move, and pissed off all sorts of old school writers (Plaschke) and baseball men (La Sorda). And who did ownership end up listening to?

    Billy has certainly earned his political capital, but it is important to remember that many GMs are hamstrung by their owners.

  4. on July 11th at 03:58 pm
    JE said:

    While I certainly agree with your larger point, I am not sure that you should have picked the Pirates as the comparison team. Huntington may not have moved Sanchez in the offseason, but he caught hell from within and the media for not trying to make a splash by bringing in a middle-of-the-pack free agent or selling off one or more of the players (e.g, Bay) whose trade value had declined by that point in time. In Huntington’s first year on the job, his business philosophy has been similar to his mentor, Shapiro, and Beane.

Pittsburgh Florist